Tuesday, August 30, 2005

ALIEN 2: SULLA TERRA (Ciro Ippolito, 1980)

Monday, August 29, 2005

Mise-en-scène: analysis of a sequence from COLLATERAL DAMAGE (Andrew Davis, 2001)


Watch the closing sequence from Andrew Davis' movie Collateral Damage.

Analyse the use of mise-en-scène within this sequence. What does the mise-en-scène tell us about the characters, narrative, themes and conflicts within the film?


Analysis: Costume & Props:
Gordy Brewer’s (Arnold Schwarzenegger) costume identifies him as a ‘blue collar’ worker (he is a fireman).
He is contrasted with the ‘white collar’ workers who populate the CIA offices: he is a man of action, and is capable of solving a situation in which they simply panic.
However, the CIA agent Peter Brandt (Elias Koteas) is likewise dressed casually, suggesting similarities with Brewer.
The computers and desks tell us that the sequence takes place in an office building; the formal, drab colour scheme tells us that this building is most likely a government building.

The ‘clutter’ of the upper offices is contrasted (or ‘juxtaposed’) with the desolation of the underground transportation corridors.
When Brewer uses an axe to rupture a gas pipe, a sign on the pipe explains his plan to us without the aid of dialogue.
©Paul Andrew Julian Lewis, 2005

Mise-en-scène: analysis of a sequence from FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE (Terence Young, 1963)


Watch the fight that takes place on the Orient Express between James Bond (Sean Connery) and Donald 'Red' Grant (Robert Shaw) in Terence Young's From Russia With Love (1963).

What does the mise-en-scène tell us about the narrative and characters?



Costume:
James Bond (Sean Connery) and Donald Grant (Robert Shaw) share similar dress.

This connotes similarity between the characters, suggesting that the two men are ‘equals’ (making the subsequent fight more evenly-matched, and therefore suspenseful).

The (formal) suits and ties act as an index of professionalism; the costumes tell us the two men are experts in their particular field.

Props (Weapons):
Guns act as symbols of violence.
At the beginning, Bond holds a gun on Grant; later, Grant holds a gun on Bond.
This ‘switching’ of the prop between characters acts as an index of the shifting power balance between Bond and Grant, again reinforcing their status as ‘equals’.

Other Props:
Bond’s briefcase contains gold coins given to him by Q; these act as an index of the wealth of the British Government (for whom Bond works).
We should recognise the set as the interior of a train compartment.

The map on the wall behind Bond indicates that the train journey takes place on the continent of Europe (and not, for example, in America).
When Grant puts on his gloves, we know that he means to harm Bond; the gloves act as an index of his intention to harm Bond.


Space and Lighting:

Director Terence Young stated that the closed confines of the train compartment made the fight seem more ‘intimate’ and more violent (commentary, 2001 DVD release).
The absence of light during the fight scene connotes danger (and is associated with horror movies).
The blue ‘tint’ would usually connote tranquility, but here acts as an index of nighttime (the setting of the sequence).

©Paul Andrew Julian Lewis, 2005


Mise-en-scène: class notes

Defining ‘mise-en-scène’
The term ‘mise-en-scène’:
  • Originates in the theatre
  • Means ‘staging’
  • is a French phrase that translates as ‘putting into the scene’

Examining mise-en-scène involves looking for the individual signs/clues that help us to read/analyse the image.

One of the ways in which we can do this involves breaking the image down into a list of key elements which can be analysed according to the rules of semiotics.


Mise-en-scène includes/is made up of
  • Lighting
  • Shadows
  • Costume
  • Décor: sets & props
  • Colour within the image
  • Physical performances/Physical characteristics of the performers
  • Placement of the actors in relation to each other.

Examining mise-en-scène in still & moving images
When you examine a film sequence, consider:
  • What is contained within the mise-en-scène;
  • What these clues within the mise-en-scène tell us about the narrative/characters.
©Paul Andrew Julian Lewis, 2005

Saturday, August 27, 2005

MR NO LEGS and HANDS OF STEEL


Read my thoughts on MR NO LEGS (aka THE AMAZING MR NO LEGS) (Riccou Browning, 1981) and Sergio Martino's MANI DI PIETRE/HANDS OF STEEL (1986): two obscure films from long-dead genres.


Could these movies be made today? Would they stand a chance in competition with contemporary Hollywood movies? Would they be shown in cinemas? And would they find an audience today?


Friday, August 26, 2005

Semiotics: An Introduction to Analysing Images

What is Semiotics?
Semiotics is:
‘The study of the social production of meaning from sign systems […] a theoretical approach and its associated methods of analysis'
O’Sullivan, Tim, 1994: Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge: 281


Semiotics is:
  • A ‘science of signs’
  • Derived from the work of the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) and the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)
  • Related to linguistics (the study of languages)
  • A way of studying how ‘sign systems’ (e.g. spoken & written languages, images) create meaning


Signs
Signs are recognisable words/images that we associate with ideas.

A sign has two parts:
  • Signifier: the object/word (e.g. a red rose)
  • Signified/Referent: the idea associated with the sign (e.g. love, passion)




Denotative & Connotative Meaning
Denotation:
Concrete or literal meaning of an object or word; the first order of meaning.

Connotation:
The more abstract meanings attributed to the sign by our culture; the second order of meaning.

Signs denote or connote certain ideas: they have two levels of meaning.



Analysis: poster--'Escape From Alcatraz' (Don Siegel, 1979)
The image denotes Clint Eastwood holding a tool and breaking through a wall.

The image possesses connotations of escape and imprisonment; our interpretation of the image may depend on whether or not we recognise the image of Alcatraz--the place has strong cultural associations that may impact on our interpretation of the poster image.






The connotative meaning of an image can be altered by manipulating the framing, focus, lighting and angle.

In films, connotative meanings can be altered by the order in which shots are edited together (or use of sound).



Different Types of Signs
There are three major types of sign:
  • Icon: the icon resembles what it signifies (e.g. a rose is an icon of ‘real’ roses)
  • Index: the index acts as evidence of its signified/referent (e.g. smoke is indexical of fire)
  • Symbol: the symbol has an arbitrary (culturally-constructed) connection with its signified (e.g. a police uniform/siren symbolises authority)


Icon
Goldfinger (Guy Hamilton, 1963)

The image of Sean Connery is an icon (of Sean Connery); it resembles its referent (the real Sean Connery).


Index


The storm clouds are an index of bad weather; they act as evidence of bad weather.









Symbol
Get Carter
(Mike Hodges, 1971)

The gun is a symbol of violence; our culture associates it with violence.









Metaphor
Metaphors
  • Are associated with poetry
  • Communicate the unknown by putting it into the context of the known
  • Condense two different ideas into one single item
For example, the phrase 'The river snakes through the jungle' explains the flow of the river (unknown) through comparing it with the motion of a snake (known).

We can examine metaphors within images by examining the individual signs contained within the image.



Semiotics: Practice
What signs are contained in this still from Wall Street (Oliver Stone, 1987)



  • The posture of Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglass) connotes confidence and authority.

  • The trophies in the background connote his competitiveness.

  • The computers connote ‘high-tech’ (for the 1980s).

  • The garish paintings and decorations (large ashtray, lamp) connote wealth but a lack of taste.

  • The clocks connote that Gekko’s work revolves around different time zones.

  • The cluttered desk connotes Gekko’s commitment to work.

  • Gekko’s clothes (tie, braces, gold watch) connote the ‘money culture’ of the 1980s.

Metaphor: The image acts explains the culture of Wall Street in the 1980s: it acts as a metaphor for this culture.


Tasks
Find one still image (preferably a film still or poster).

Write an analysis of the image (two sides of A4). Identify the signs; identify the denotative and connotative levels of meaning; identify the different types of signs (icon, index & symbol); identify the way in which the image can act as a metaphor for something (ie explain an idea).

Research different shot types and their connotations:
    Medium shot
    Long shot
    Close up
    High/Low angleDutch angle/Canted angle

©Paul Andrew Julian Lewis, 2005



Studying Narrative: Class Notes

Defining 'Narrative'
The word narrative essentially refers to ‘story’.

Narratology is the study of narratives/stories (and their structures and recurring character types).


Narrative:
  • Common to all forms of storytelling (literature, documentaries, fairy tales, history books, biographies).
  • Narratives can also be found in painting, mythology and theatre.

How do we study narratives?

The study of narratives involves examining the codes and conventions (traditional ways of doing things) that are used to tell stories.

Most narratives in Hollywood films strive to attain a level of realism (or verisimilitude) in order for audiences to identify with the events taking place on screen.


Narrative & Diegesis
In the 1980s, Gérard Genette distinguished between narrative, narrating and diegesis.
  • Narrating refers to the actual act of telling the story (e.g. a voice-over telling us the story).
  • Narrative = story.
  • Diegesis = to the relationships between the events that make up the story (the causal relationships between events, or the ‘plot’).
The modernist author E. M. Forster made a similar distinction between ‘story’ and ‘plot’ (or ‘diegesis’). For Forster, plot differs from story in the way in which it establishes a causative relationship between events: whereas a story is a description of events, a plot seeks to explain how the events impact on one another.

Forster's example of a story was 'The King died, and then the Queen died'; his example of a plot was 'The King died, and then the Queen died of grief'.


What function does narrative serve for us as spectators?
When we watch a film, we use our experience of similar narratives to try to guess the ending of the film.

We usually expect narratives to be based on cause-and-effect logic (i.e. one event causes the next event, which causes the next event), and to possess a clear beginning, middle and end. These types of narrative are described as linear narratives.


Approaches to Narratology
How are narratives structured?
One of the key figures in the study of narrative is the early-Twentieth Century Russian Formalist Tzvetan Todorov.
Todorov argued that narratives usually start at a point of stable equilibrium (i.e. everything is calm, and under control).
This equilibrium suffers a disruption: something happens that threatens the characters.
The heroes take action against the threat, and at the end of the film the equilibrium is restored and the narrative reaches its resolution.

The basic formula for a narrative, then, is equilibriumdisruptionrestoration of equilibrium/resolution.
However, the equilibrium at the end of the narrative is usually different from the equilibrium at the start of the film, very often because the characters have learnt something along the way.

Can you identify the equilibrium—disruption—resolution narrative chain in a recent Hollywood film?


Narratives and Sequences
Film narratives can be broken down into sequences.
Each sequence contains its own mini-narrative; its own equilibrium—disruption—resolution narrative chain.

Sequence Length
In Hollywood films, sequences usually last for between 5 and 10 mins;
An average Hollywood movie (90-120mins) will contain about 25 to 30 sequences.

Sequences in European or Asian cinema can last much longer;
You may find that European and Asian movies contain fewer sequences and work at a much slower pace than Hollywood movies.


Narrative and Character Types
In the 1920s, another Russian Formalist named Vladimir Propp argued that most narratives contained eight key character types
(examples from The Matrix, 1999):
  • The Hero (Anderson/Neo)
  • The Villain (The Matrix/The Agents)
  • The Donor (gives something to the Hero that helps him complete his quest) (The Oracle, or Morpheus)
  • The Helper (the Hero’s ‘assistant’) (Tank)
  • The Princess (the ‘love interest,’ who often has to be rescued) (Trinity)
  • Her Father (an authority figure to the Princess) (Morpheus)
  • The Dispatcher (the person who sends the Hero on his quest) (Morpheus again)
  • The False Hero (somebody who appears to be a second Hero, but is in fact a Villain, or is defeated by the Villain part-way through the narrative) (Cypher)
Propp also argued that many narratives possess a structure similar to the following:

  1. 'A member of a family leaves home (the hero is introduced);
  2. An interdiction is addressed to the hero ('don't go there', 'go to this place');
  3. The interdiction is violated (villain enters the tale);The villain makes an attempt at reconnaissance (either villain tries to find the children/jewels etc; or intended victim questions the villain);
  4. The villain gains information about the victim;
  5. The villain attempts to deceive the victim to take possession of victim or victim's belongings (trickery; villain disguised, tries to win confidence of victim);
  6. Victim taken in by deception, unwittingly helping the enemy;
  7. Villain causes harm/injury to family member (by abduction, theft of magical agent, spoiling crops, plunders in other forms, causes a disappearance, expels someone,
  8. casts spell on someone, substitutes child etc, comits murder, imprisons/detains someone, threatens forced marriage, provides nightly torments); Alternatively, a member of family lacks something or desires something (magical potion etc);
  9. Misfortune or lack is made known, (hero is dispatched, hears call for help etc/ alternative is that victimised hero is sent away, freed from imprisonment);
  10. Seeker agrees to, or decides upon counter-action;
  11. Hero leaves home;
  12. Hero is tested, interrogated, attacked etc, preparing the way for his/her receiving magical agent or helper (donor);
  13. Hero reacts to actions of future donor (withstands/fails the test, frees captive, reconciles disputants, performs service, uses adversary's powers against them);
  14. Hero acquires use of a magical agent (directly transferred, located, purchased, prepared, spontaneously appears, eaten/drunk, help offered by other characters);
  15. Hero is transferred, delivered or led to whereabouts of an object of the search;
  16. Hero and villain join in direct combat;
  17. Hero is branded (wounded/marked, receives ring or scarf);
  18. Villain is defeated (killed in combat, defeated in contest, killed while asleep, banished);
  19. Initial misfortune or lack is resolved (object of search distributed, spell broken, slain person revivied, captive freed);
  20. Hero returns;
  21. Hero is pursued (pursuer tries to kill, eat, undermine the hero);
  22. Hero is rescued from pursuit (obstacles delay pursuer, hero hides or is hidden, hero transforms unrecognisably, hero saved from attempt on his/her life);
  23. Hero unrecognised, arrives home or in another country;
  24. False hero presents unfounded claims;
  25. Difficult task proposed to the hero (trial by ordeal, riddles, test of strength/endurance, other tasks);
  26. Task is resolved;
  27. Hero is recognised (by mark, brand, or thing given to him/her);
  28. False hero or villain is exposed;
  29. Hero is given a new appearance (is made whole, handsome, new garments etc);
  30. Villain is punished;
  31. Hero marries and ascends the throne (is rewarded/promoted).'
Quoted from: Jerry Everard, Year Unknown: 'Introduction to Vladimir Propp'. [Online] URL: http://mural.uv.es/vifresal/Propp.htm

Homework:
a) Research definitions of some terms associated with semiotics (sign, icon, index, symbol)
b) Watch one film: identify the equilibrium—disruption—resolution chain; describe and discuss the e—d—r chain in one sequence; and identify as many of Propp’s eight character types as possible. (2 sides of A4.)
©Paul Andrew Julian Lewis, 2005

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

THE MACHINIST (Brad Anderson, 2004)


The Machinist is Brad Anderson's follow-up to the well-received Session 9 (2001). Session 9 is a story of psychological angst disguised as a ghost story; likewise, The Machinist is a story of guilt, obsession and emotional trauma disguised as something approaching a science-fiction film (complete with 1950s-style theremin-based music on the soundtrack).

In the film, Christian Bale plays Trevor Reznik, a machine-operator who hasn't slept for a year. Reznik suffers from insomnia and, when he begins to encounter a mysterious colleague named Ivan (John Sharian) and causes an accident in which his workmate Miller (Michael Ironside) loses his arm, Reznik begins to suspect that there is a conspiracy to drive him insane. Whether Reznik's paranoia has any basis or not, it causes him to distance himself from his work colleagues.

Reznik sees the prostitute Stevie (Jennifer Jason Leigh) regularly. But he also becomes involved with Marie (Aitana Sánchez-Gijón), a coffee-shop waitress who has a small son named Nicholas (Matthew Romero). For Reznik, Marie and Nicholas remind him of his own relationship with his mother. Trying to ingratiate himself into family life, Reznik's efforts are to a large extent unsuccessful, and in the process he also alienates Stevie.

At the end of the movie, it is revealed that a year earlier, Reznik killed Marie's son in a hit-and-run accident, and his insomnia is a consequence of his repression of his guilt for Nicholas' death. Much of the film (Ivan; Reznik's encounters with Marie) have been part of Reznik's fantasy. The closing scenes see Reznik imprisoned for the death of Nicholas and finally finding sleep in the release of his repressed guilt.

The coverage of Christian Bale's weight loss (over 60 pounds) for the role of Trevor Reznik has overshadowed discussion of the film's themes. If the film has a central weakness, it is that these themes are not explored in a satisfactory amount of depth: the film's themes hinge on Reznik's guilt at the death of Nicholas. However, because this guilt is not revealed until the closing scenes of the movie, until the final reel the film's themes remain ambiguous, buried under the filmmakers' obsession with exploring Reznik's paranoia.

Much like the 'ghost story' in Session 9, the extent to which Reznik's paranoia has any foundation is ultimately an insignificant non-question, a classic piece of misdirection: whether Reznik's paranoia is 'fantasy' or 'reality' really has no significance next to the issue of his guilt. However, in Session 9 Anderson managed to pull off this misdirection successfully, without detracting from the 'real' issues at the heart of the film—Gordon's guilt at the murder of his family and the question of what causes violence ('I live in the weak and wounded'). But in Session 9 Anderson didn't allow the film's 'ghost story' to take as much hold of the narrative as he allows Reznik's paranoia to dominate The Machinist. Consequently, Anderson's attempt to misdirect his audience in The Machinist is less successful: whereas in Session 9, Gordon's guilt was seamlessly intertwined with the investigation of the 'ghost story' and the final revelation had a natural and seamless connection with what had gone before, in The Machinist Reznik's paranoia is not an integral part of the film's exploration of its central character's guilt. Consequently, in The Machinist the final revelation comes out of left-field, leaving the viewer feeling a little cheated. Ultimately, the film's ambiguity will alienate as many viewers as it will win over, but in hindsight the issues that the film confronts gain added significance.

The film is built on a series of repeated gestures or motifs, suggesting that the filmmakers are trying to convey either a sense of routine or a pattern of circularity to events. These repeated gestures (for example, the line 'If you were any thinner, you wouldn't exist') are sometimes acknowledged by Reznik, who puts them down as deja vu. Key among these repeated motifs is Reznik's insistent hand-washing, accompanied by his gazing at his own reflection. These gestures tie into the film's central theme of guilt: we first see Reznik washing his hands after dumping Ivan's body in the opening sequence, and at another point he repeats the same gesture after sex. Throughout the film, it is apparent that Reznik seeks cleansing, a washing away of his sins.

The film's other main preoccupation seems to be with depicting the alienation at the heart of industry and urban life: a telling low-angle shot in the opening sequence shows Reznik dwarfed by huge industrial chimney stacks, and during the scenes set in his workplace, Reznik is frequently filmed through machinery, suggesting a sense of entrapment in the routine day-to-day grind of existence. All of the characters are trapped within their lives and, to a large extent, their obsessions: each of the central characters (Reznik, Stevie, Miller, Marie) find their horizons limited—they all live in a prison of sorts.

Reznik's encounters with Marie and her son (whose death Reznik is responsible for) are played against the scenes depicting Reznik's isolation (in his apartment; at work) and scenes in which Reznik seems to deliberately alienate people who are trying to connect with him—for example, his outbursts in the latter half of the film directed at both Miller and Stevie. So throughout the film, there's an odd juxtaposition of Reznik's attempt to 'connect' with an idealised vision of family life (whose destruction he is responsible for) and his inability to 'connect' with people in his daily life.

In this context, there's also something extraordinarily poignant about Reznik's obsession with family life: he's a rogue male whose guilt about inadvertently destroying a family dominates every day of his life, no matter how much he has tried to suppress it; and he's a man who is unable to settle down, restless in his obsessive quest for something he can never attain. It's hard not to see this as symbolic, as representing something much larger: the central obsessions of modern masculinity—a guilt over its inability to find a place in the 'modern family' and an insecurity over the roles men play in society.


Ultimately, this is a film about how a man has created a prison for his mind. This prison has been created through his sense of guilt, but in the film it's inextricable connected to the landscape that Reznik inhabits—a cold, soulless industrial-urban complex. The prison, then, is the prison of modern life, built for us by our own insecurities and obsessions, and regulated by our conflicting desires for both belonging and self-destruction. The Machinist is a film about our failure to connect with other human beings, the self-imposed isolation many of us experience; it's a film that reminds us of the modernist author E. M. Forster's observation that in life, we struggle to 'only connect': '[o]nly connect! [....] Only connect the prose and the passion, and both will be exalted, And human love will be seen at its height. Live in fragments no longer. Only connect, and the beast and the monk, robbed of the isolation that is life to either, will die'.
©Paul Andrew Julian Lewis, 2005

View My Stats